Header Ads

PHONOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF VOWEL HARMONY IN TÈÈ ON VOWEL HARMONY


VOWEL HARMONY
4.0     Introduction
          Various approaches have been employed in the discussion of the process of vowel harmony in languages. These include the segmental approach which views vowel harmony as an assimilation process; the linear generative approach which employs the iterative and simultaneous rules to account for vowel harmony and the prosodic approach as employed by Lightner (1965).
          All these approaches put together, one way or the other left lots of issues dangling in the air with no substantial explanation. Such issues include: the neutral vowel hypothesis, the mixed vowel roots and opacity.

4.1     Vowel Harmony Process
          Vowel harmony is an interesting and a prominent feature of vowels in Tèè. Tèè has seven oral vowels divided into two equal sets with two narrow and two wide vowels each and three neutral vowels. All these, as well as the nasalized vowel participate in this process. Examples in (1) below illustrate the manifestation of vowel harmony in roots language:
1.       (a)     /kpòbè/                 ‘hoe’
                   /kòròkè/      ‘ground’
                   /ákóbē/                 ‘head’
          (b)     /tOgE/           ‘show’
                   /kEgO/          ‘laugh’
                   /bEtO/           ‘chair’
          (c)      /kpùgì/                  ‘money’
                   /áwíí/           ‘grass’
                   /nṹtO@/               ‘door’
                   /sínùló/        ‘stink’
                   /bùrá/          ‘think
                   /lErà/                ‘send
                   /tòrá/           ‘abuse’

The examples in (4.1(a) and b) indicate the co-occurrence of [e, o] and [E, O] to the exclusion of [i, a, u] and in (4.1(c) which co-occur with the two sets as neutral vowels. These examples show the occurrence of vowels [e, o] which produce with non-retraction of the tongue root, and the occurrence of [E, O] which are produced with retracted tongue root. Based on this observation one can therefore posit two harmonic sets and a neutral set for Tèè as done in earlier works. The two harmonic sets are shown in 2 below:

2.       Harmonic Set A                      Harmonic Set B
          [-ATR]            e    o                           [+ATR]     E        O
                      (a, u, i)                                       (a, u, i)

One observes that in 1(c) that vowels [i, a, u] function as neutral vowels because they do occur with vowels of Sets A and B. This is a unique feature of vowel harmony process in Tèè unlike some other African languages in which only one or two vowels might be neutral vowels. Examples of neutral vowels in Tèè include [i, u, a].
3.       [lErà]                ‘send’
          [­ĩ́E)@]             ‘heart’
          [pie]            ‘medicine’
          [pĩ̀O@]                 ‘finger nail’
          [pio]            ‘village name
          [ákpó]                  ‘bone’        
          [sùé]            ‘spear’
          [álóló]                   ‘bottle

4.2            Characteristics of Vowel Harmony
Following the observation of Clements (1977) on Akan, Chumbow (1982) on Ogori, Ihionu (1984) on Igbo and Ngulube (2013), this study produces evidence which shows that Tèè also displays the following properties like all symmetrical and asymmetrical systems.

1.       Phonetic Motivatedness
          Vowels in Tèè are classified into two harmonic sets using phonetic property of the Advancement/retraction of the tongue root.
          Thus, vowel harmony process in Tèè involves the spreading of a phonetic feature: Advanced Tongue Root [ATR] to vowels within a phonological word. It is the root vowel that harmonize category of affixes and clitics. To see how this operates, let us look at a process of word formation in Tèè.





3.       Agentive Nouns
          dáá              ‘sleep’                            ádám           ‘sleeper’
          táá              ‘work’                            átám           ‘worker’
          bOO              ‘fear’                    ObOm                   ‘fearful person’
          zágbárá       ‘dream’                ázágbárám  ‘dreamer’

Agentive nouns in Tèè are derived from verbs by the prefixation of the affix [a-] or [O-] to the existing verb stems. The choice between [a-] and [O-] is determined by the root. Such that, [a-] which is [-ATR] vowel occurs with [-ATR] root vowels while [O-] which is [+ATR] vowel occurs with [+ATR] root. Vowels as shown in the data in 3 above.

2.       Root Control
          The principle of root control operates in the Tèè vowel harmony process. Within a phonological word, it is the root vowel that determines the harmonic category of affixes and clitics. To see how this operates, let us look at a process of word formation in Tèè where nouns are derived from verbs as shown in 3 above.
          Another important point worth noting in connection with the agentive nouns is the co-occurrence relationship between the vowels. [+ATR] vowels interact freely and exclude [-ATR] vowels while [-ATR] vowels interact freely also to the exclusion of [+ATR] vowels. This constitutes evidence that the vowel harmony process in Tèè is real.

3.       Non-Optionality
          Vowel harmony operates on every vowel controlled by the stem and within its domain. To illustrate this, let us consider the following examples on question formation.

4.       (i)      mdéè è/èè?              ‘What did I eat?’
          (ii)     msíìm mOOO@?           ‘Where did I go?’
          (iii)    mdēè è/ēè?              ‘What should I do?’
          (iv)    msiimmOO?                  ‘Where should I go?’

The non-optionality feature of vowel harmony is proved in where all vowels obey the harmony rule.
          The alternating forms of the question markers mdéè and msíì is determined by the harmonic category of the vowels of the verb stems /èè and mOO@ respectively.

4.       The Autosegmental Analysis of Vowel Harmony in Tèè
          One of the major faults of the Generative theory is the claim that phonological features are single tiered and linearly ordered. This claim stems from the hypothesis that speech utterances are made up of discrete units which can be split into segments. These segments are linearly ordered and made up of unordered bundles of features. Thus the word ‘pin’ is represented below as:
 

          +cons                             +syll                     +cons
          -nasal                             -nasal                             +nasal
          +aut                      -High                    +son
          -cont                     -Back                    +Aut
          -Delrel                            +Tense                           °
          -Cor                      °                           °
          -voice                             °                           °
          °                           °                           °
          °                           °                           °
          P                           I                            N
Goldsmith (1976) claims that this assumption constitutes a problem to the Generative theory. Thus, issues such as floating tones, contour tones, and so forth cannot be adequately accounted for in the Generative theory. These facts are extensively treated in Goldsmith (1976). The most basic notion of autosegmental theory is that phonological representation is non-linear. Speech sounds constitute features which can be abstracted and placed on separate autonomous tiers.
          Thus, phonological features such as tones, nasality, vowel harmony are extractable and be represented on independent tiers parallel to the segmental tier. The relationship between the extracted features on the autosegmental tier and the segmental tier is indicated by the association convention which preserves the well-formedness condition throughout the course of phonological derivation.
          The diagram below illustrates the autosegmental representation of tone:

                   Tonal tier:            +H                        -H
                   Segmental tier:           +syll.                        +syll.
                                                -cons.                             -cons.

The Association Principles
          The WFCS proposed by Goldsmith (1976) for tones are stated below:
(a)              All vowels are associated with at least one tone.
(b)             All tones are associated with at least one vowel.
(c)              Association lines do not cross.

These principles play an important role in linking the tonal tier to the segmental tier. Apart from the Goldsmith (1976) linking proposals, various versions are available from different authors. Among the authors are Clements (1976), Clements (1980), Halle and Vergnaud (1982), Vander Hulst and Smith (1982) and Pulleyblank (1986).
          However, the version employed for the treatment of vowel harmony in this study, is the Clements (1981:146) where he states that, ‘For association to take place, element on the ‘P-level’, ‘P-base’ and ‘Open String’ need to be determined. The interpretation of this in relation to the autosegmental tier is given below: Level I, P-base. The level at which P-bearing units are represented in this case, units which bear the P-segments or features. It is the level at which the vowels (which bear harmonic features) and intervening consonants are represented # CVCVCV #.
          Level 2, P-level: The level at which the harmony autosegment or harmonic feature [+back, + ATR] is represented. Clement’s version of the association conventions are given below in order of priority on it will be employed in this study.

(a)              Given a continuous string ‘S’ consisting of one or more free P-segments and an open string ‘T’ which occurs in its domain, associate P-segments in ‘S’ with P-bearing units in ‘T’ in a one to one manner from left to right.
(b)             Given an open string ‘T’ remaining after the operation of (a), associate each P-bearing unit in ‘T’ with the P-segment in whose domain it fools (giving precedence to the P-segment associated with a P-bearing unit which occurs to the left of T).

Having stated the motions of the autosegmental theory, we are now going to employ the theory for a full description of the vowel harmony process in Tèè. Chumbow (1982:75) proposes that all vowels of affixes and clitics that undergo vowel harmony are reducible to four basic vowels from which the seven surface vowels are derived by root controlled vowel harmony, determined by the feature [+ATR] we shall apply this to Tèè with seven vowel system. These are represented below:
                                         i

                                      e
                                        o
                                         E
                                        O
                                          u
                                            a
                                           A
Instead of seven vowels, four vowels and an autosegment [A] are stated, and the principles governing their distribution are two:
(1)             Phonemic similarity. The principle states that, the most phonetically similar vowels on either side of the harmony feature are paired. This is viable in Tèè where we observe these pair [E and e], [o and O], [u and O], [i and a], [e and a] and [E and a].
(2)             Optional utilization: This second principle states that all attested vowels in the language are maximally used. Thus, in Tèè as evident from our examples provided earlier, we observe that every vowel participates fully in the vowel harmony process.

We have provided evidence early in this chapter to show that vowel harmony operates in Tèè. We stated some universal characteristics of vowel harmony and provided examples to justify the existence of vowel harmony in Tèè. We now present the autosegmental analysis of some of these examples to justify the fact that vowel harmony is an autosegment in Tèè.
Agentive Noun: As earlier mentioned these are nouns derived from verbs.
                   Verb
                   dáá              ‘sleep’                  ádám           ‘sleeper’
                   táá              ‘work’                  átám           ‘worker’
                   bOO           ‘fear’           ObOm                ‘fearer’
                   zágbárá       ‘dream’       ázágbárá     ‘dreamer’

Agentive nouns are derived from monosyllabic verbs by affixation of a prefix and suffix to the verb root. The affixes are a-/-O prefixes and -m suffix. The vowel prefixes a-/-O must harmonize the verb root vowels. The prefixes copy the tone of the vowel in the verb root.
          The harmony feature [+/-ATR] spreads from the verb stem into the prefixes and the suffix. The stages of derivation include, the first stage is the underlying representation of the verb stems which is linked to [+ATR] or [-ATR] depending on the harmonic group of verb.
          Stage two is how the harmony features spreads from vowels of the verb stem into the prefixes and suffixes. The autosegmental representations are presented below:
         

                    -A                          -A
                   a+da+m                          adam

                    -A                          -A
                   a+ta+m                            atam

                    +A                         +A
                   O+bO+m                      ObOm

                    -A                          -A
                a+zagbara+m          a+zagbaram

In this chapter we have presented the vowel harmony processes as it obtains in Tèè with evidence from roots and affixes. In this process we stated features expected of a harmony and as it is in Tèè. We employed the autosegmental theory to describe the vowel harmony process in Tèè.

No comments

Powered by Blogger.